There is value in synthesis
"... With AI, the value of the raw production of information is approaching zero — but difficulty and scarcity always remain, somewhere..."
➡️ Welcome to Network Theory. I'm StJohn Piano, CTO @ Solidi Exchange and a Blockchain Advisor @ Tela Network.
🌎 Sponsor: Solidi Exchange
www.solidi.co
Solidi anchors crypto in the UK. Solidi is a UK-based cryptocurrency exchange and is FCA-registered. Its platform supports fast, simple purchase of Bitcoin and several other major cryptos, and it offers a phone-based OTC service for any other coins.
🌎 Sponsor: Legala
legala.app
Legala is a client-facing chatbot for legal firms that uses artificial intelligence to automate client interviews, gather key facts, and free up valuable time for what really matters: your legal work.
🌎 Sponsor: Tela Network
tela.network
Tela Network is a narrow channel for a noisy world. Goal: Survive and thrive in the age of AI. Subscribe to the channel for free. Join the network to post.
[Chat excerpt: 26 Feb 2026]
StJohn Piano: A thought i am circling around a lot recently, which has relevance to your career:
StJohn Piano: There is value in synthesis.
StJohn Piano: With AI, the value of the raw production of information, e.g. an article or a code module, is approaching zero, or at least a very small amount. For example, the physical and mental cost of typing and grammar checking has dropped precipitously.
StJohn Piano: However, difficulty and scarcity and therefore tradable value always remain, somewhere, somehow.
StJohn Piano: I see and experience difficulty with the
• validation
• curation / selection
• and synthesis / arrangement
of information.
I also see other people struggling with these problems every day.
StJohn Piano: I would avoid work that primarily involves the raw production of information.
StJohn Piano: (Unless done at scale with the new tools, in which case you are operating a factory.)
StJohn Piano: But synthesis - this remains at human scale, and remains difficult, and therefore worth paying for.
StJohn Piano: This includes using AI to generate a synthesis - one must still validate the result, which requires modelling and grasping the synthesis in one's own mind.
StJohn Piano: And, due to Jevons paradox, the work involved in synthesis may increase enormously.
StJohn Piano: Which is in fact what is occurring to me in my own work, very rapidly.
StJohn Piano: ^ will write post.
Borges: Very relevant indeed.
Borges: Thanks for sharing your thought. I’m thinking a lot about Lego-like moves to make.
Borges: The job market is precarious. I’m trying to come up with moves that stack.
Borges: On the value of synthesis, what you describe also happens in politics. At least at the level I’m familiar with locally.
StJohn Piano: Ah, really ? Please expand.
Borges: There’s a lot of information out there and a lot that exists "in potentia". But the only way something happens is if someone connects the data points and makes something coherent out of them.
I phrase it vaguely, because this applies both to political communication (ie, building a narrative) and legal processes - someone needs to collect the data points, make sure they’re valid, and weave them together.
Borges: It does actually come down to will in this things.
StJohn Piano: Aha: validation, selection, synthesis...
Borges: Someone needs to will something to happen
Borges: I am not the most knowledgable person in [redacted], but people are willing to share information with me in the hopes that I can make something happen.
StJohn Piano: Re: will: this, also, with a software product.
👉 Any thoughts ? You can write a reply to this article on Tela Network:
tela.network/log/108
📩 Contact StJohn Piano on Tela:
tela.app/id/stjohn_piano/5db830
☕️ Follow StJohn Piano on LinkedIn:
linkedin.com/in/stjohnpiano